Graham v. Los Angeles First National Trust & Savings Bank
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This appeal is from a judgment dismissing the action after an order sustaining a general demurrer of the defendant bank to the third amended complaint without leave to amend.
The third amended complaint, which we will refer to hereinafter as the complaint, sets up that on the first day of June, 1928, plaintiffs entered into a contract with the Los Angeles First National Trust and Savings Bank for the purchase of a certain lot or parcel of land situated in the city of Burbank, county of Los Angeles; that the personal defendants, one of whom operated under the name of Hollywood Organization,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Cobbs v. CobbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Adams v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.