Lobdell v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
These actions, bearing superior court numbers 52621 and 52412 respectively, were consolidated for the purpose of trial and on appeal. For convenience, the Lobdells will be referred to as plaintiffs, and William B. Miller and Frank 0 ’Farrell as defendants. On a motion to dismiss the appeal, these actions were before this court for consideration. (Miller v. Lobdell, 109 Cal.App.2d 628 [241 P.2d 30].) A brief statement of the issues and factual background is there related. On July 2, 1947, plaintiffs, who had been in the restaurant business but never in the hotel business, purchased from…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Beaumont Investment, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Zalkind v. Ceradyne, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Robison v. KatzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.