Legal Opinion

Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. Wood

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1896No. S. F. No. 69PublishedCited by 171 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. Joseph P. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff presented a claim against the estate of Seth Cook, deceased, of which the defendant Wood was executor, for the sum of twenty-three thousand five hundred and forty dollars, which on January 15,1890, was allowed by the executor and approved by the judge of the superior court, and filed with the clerk. Thereafter the American Mill and Mining Company, a corporation, offered to the plaintiff to assume •the said indebtedness of said estate, and to execute its promissory note therefor to the plaintiff, payable sixty days after date, and, on October 1, 1890, the board of directors of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Lataillade v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Oakland v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Underhill v. Santa Barbara Land, Building, & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API