Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Vannini

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1956No. Civ. 16545PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendants for $40,000 balance alleged to be due on a contract to purchase certain mining properties. Defendants answered and cross-complained, negatively and affirmatively pleading fraud on the part of plaintiff. The trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to the third amended answer and cross-complaint. Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings. The motion was granted. Defendants appeal from the judgment thus secured.

The controversy involves the purchase and sale of an abandoned gold mine in Tuolumne County. The pleadings show the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Styne v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Empire Gas Corp. v. Small's LP Gas Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Hills Transportation Co. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Manderville v. PCG & S GROUP, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API