United States v. Bartiromo
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A-. 8206 (T. D. 37807) [Oral argument Apr. 8, 1919, by Mr. Hanson.]
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
This importation consists of coral beads admittedly temporarily strung. As imported, they have been cut to final globular shape,, pierced, graded, and temporarily strung in final relation from large to small, for use and wear as coral necklaces. -The collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles classified the merchandise for dutiable purposes as “beads * * * of all kinds, * * * strung loosely on thread for facility in transportation only,” under paragraph 335 of the tariff act of 1913, reading:
333. Beads and spangles of all kinds, including imitation pearl beads, not threaded or strung, or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. BeierleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Woolworth Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- United States v. Lamport Export Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Walco Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Arman Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.