Legal Opinion

United States v. Lamport Export Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 23, 1928No. 2919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the United States Customs Court. The merchandise involved consists of amber beads temporarily strung on *395yellow silk cord. Those represented by Exhibit 1 are graduated. Those represented by Exhibit 2 are of uniform size. The strings are without clasps.

The merchandise was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York at 80 per centum ad valorem as unfinished jewelry under paragraph 1428 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 1428. Jewelry, commonly or commercially so known, finished or unfinished, of whatever material composed, valued above 20…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Walco Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Arman Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Protest 954879-G/87970 of American Jewelers Bureau, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1942
  5. S. Schwabacher & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API