United States v. Woolworth Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8320 (T. D. 38270). [Oral argument Nov. 5, 1920, by Mr. Lawrence and Mr. SbarrettsJ
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
It is agreed by all parties to 'this appeal that the subjects thereof are "imitation pearl necklaces.” They are of a cheap variety carried in the jewelry department of the stores of these importers. They are, however, concededly valued at “above 20 cents per dozen pieces.” They consist of imitation pearl beads made of glass filled with wax, permanently strung, fastened with a metal clasp, and have as a part thereof an imitation pearl pendant, pear shaped, which constitutes a substantial and attractive part of the'necklace. This pendant is easily a sufficiently important part of the necklace…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. Goldberg's SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. BartiromoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Doragon Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. Andrews Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.