Legal Opinion

United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 11, 1911No. 29PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, Abstract 17223 (T. D. 28481).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Yries, Judge

This action concerns rhodium. The collector of customs at the port of New York, upon an advisory classification from the appraiser *159at that port, assessed it for duty as a "metallic mineral substance, crude,” at 20 per cent ad valorem, under the provisions of paragraph 183 of the tariff act of 1897, which reads:

Metallic mineral substances in a crude state, and metals unwrought, not specially provided for in this act, twenty per centum ad valorem; monazite sand and thorite, six cents per pound.

The appraiser reported it as "metallic rhodium” and advised the classification above given, which was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Adams v. BancroftU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1838

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Smith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Schade & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  5. United States v. American Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API