Legal Opinion

American Bead Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1916No. 1601PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7754 (T. D. 35591).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal concerns headed chains or necklaces, some with and others without metal clasps. When present the clasps are of base metal, large, crude, colored and of the kind customarily used for carrying fans, bags, or similar articles. The beads are of various materials other than metal. Some are of wood, others gelatin or paste, china or colored glass. They do not, save one sample in an insignificant degree, imitate any of v the precious or semiprecious stones. Including and comprising the great bulk are necklaces in imitation of jet. They are all intended to be worn on or about the *20person…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Marshall Field & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. United States v. Doragon Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API