Legal Opinion

Fensterer & Ruhe v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 30, 1910No. 37PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal hom decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract. 21678 (T. D. 29946); transferred from United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Judge

The question involved in this appeal is the proper classification of certain articles spoken of as rings for incandescent gaslights. The-

*94Boai’d of United'States General Appraisers found that the rings were bisque, liable for duty at 55 per cent advalorem under paragraph 96 of the tariff act of 1897, which reads as follows:

96. All other china, porcelain, parían, bisque, earthen, stone, and crockery ware, and manufactures thereof, or of which the same is the component material of chief value, by whatever name known, not specially provided for in this act, if painted, tinted, stained, enameled,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. A. W. Faber, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. United States v. NeumanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Allied Food Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  5. Nevin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API