Legal Opinion

United States v. Beierle

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1911No. 269PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7019 (T. D. 30612).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Yries, Judge

This appeal as it reaches this court involves the dutiable classification under the tariff law of 1909 of barettes, composed of base metal set with imitation jet.

When the case was before the board there, were three classes of merchandise involved.

First, hat pins having tops set with imitation precious stones and composed of glass or paste other than imitation jet.

These were assessed by the collector as glass, cut, at 60 per cent ad valorem. The board held that they were properly dutiable at 45 per cent ad valorem under the appropriate provision of the tariff law on authority of United States…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robertson v. RosenthalSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Frei Art Glass Co. v. UnitedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API