Walco Bead Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliveb, Chief Judge:
This case relates to merchandise described on the invoice as “Rhinestone Rondelles,” which were assessed with *163duty at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1527 (d), as modified by T. D. 52739, for “Stampings * * * of metal, whether or not set with glass or paste, finished or partly finished, separate or in strips or sheets, suitable for use in the manufacture of any articles provided for in paragraph 1527 (a), (b), or (c), Tariff Act of 1930 * * Paragraph 1527 (a), (b), or (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides for the following…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. JudaeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. BartiromoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arman Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Dolliff v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962