Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Elmer R. Sly Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1930No. Docket No. 4218PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
The plaintiff had judgment against Richard E. Eagan in the sum of $2,400, from which judgment the defendant appeals.
The record shows that the defendant Elmer R. Sly Company is a trust estate formed under and by virtue of a trust indenture, dated the fifteenth day of March, 1925. The trust instrument provides in section 3 as follows:
‘ ‘ Every note, bond, contract, instrument, certificate or undertaking, and every other act or thing whatsoever, executed or done by the trustees, or any of them, in connection with this trust shall be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Bagley v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Farmers' Exchange Bank v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bell v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Gummer v. MairsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Sunniland Fruit, Inc. v. VerniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Norden v. MetsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- United States, for Use of Moseley v. MannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Howard v. Hancock Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.