Legal Opinion
United States, for Use of Moseley v. Mann
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1952No. 4404_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case is whether Great American Indemnity Company is lia ble to J. R. C. Moseley under its bond given to K. W. Mann, pursuant to the requirements of the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq. Mann had a contract with the United States for the construction of a flood control project near Duncan, Oklahoma, The bond was given in fulfillment of the provisions of the Miller Act, requiring .the contractor to give a bond to secure payment of labor and material claims on the job.
To enable him to perform his contract, Mann entered into a contract with J. R. C.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- McCully v. McCullySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- City of Seymour v. Municipal Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Carpenter v. Elmer R. Sly Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Lawton v. ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Atlantic States Construction Co. v. Drummond & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Cliff Byler v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Homestake-Sapin Partners v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Chandler-Simpson, Inc. v. GorrellWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
- Vogt v. HovanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.