Legal Opinion
Bagley v. Cohen
California Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1898No. Sac. No. 219PublishedCited by 27 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from orders denying a motion to change the place of trial, and denying a motion to set aside a default and judgment. E. W. Bisley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This action is brought against the defendants upon their guaranty of a contract made to the plaintiff by one Gould. The contract is as follows:
“On or before sixty days I, E. H. Gould, do hereby agree to pay to F. S. Bagley, or order, out of the profits realized by me from my business of packing raisins at Malaga, during the present season, the sum of three hundred and ten ($310) dollars in gold coin of the United States of America.
“Dated Fresno, September 12, 1894.”
“E. H. GOULD. [Seal]”
Prior to the delivery of this contract, and as a part of the same transaction, the defendant subscribed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Poirier v. GravelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Love v. MaburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hazeltinte v. LarcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Otis v. HaseltineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by27 opinions
- Anglo-California Trust Co. v. Oakland RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Hill v. CombsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Spangenberg v. SpangenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- W. A. Rose Co. v. Municipal Court for Oakland-Piedmont Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Carter v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.