Legal Opinion
Norden v. Metson
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 1, 1946No. Civ. No. 13055PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
In 1935 appellant (a civil engineer) was employed by Mr. and Mrs. MacKenzie Gordon and Mrs. Gordon’s mother (hereinafter called the Gordons). The Gordons were minority stockholders of the Santa Cruz Lime Company. They were asserting a claim, as such minority stockholders, against the Santa Cruz Portland Cement Company for encroachments by the latter company upon the property of the former. The Gordons had discussed the possibility of arbitrating this claim with officers of the Santa Cruz Portland Cement Company and appellant was employed by the Gordons to evaluate their holdings and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wise v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Lynch v. Keystone Consol. Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Martin v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Detwiler v. CluneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ferroline Corp. v. General AniLine & Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Alpha Beta Food Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union Local 770California Supreme Court · 1955
- Belfonte v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Estate of Albert Mikeska, Appeal of: DilkevicieneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Estate of Albert Mikeska, Appeal of: DilkevicieneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.