Legal Opinion
Bell v. Adams
California Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1907No. L.A. No. 1682PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hubert T. Morrow, Oscar C. Mueller, and Sidney J. Parsons, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This case was transferred to the district court of appeal of the second district, and that court being unable to agree upon a decision, it was again transferred to this court. The following opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Allen of that court meets with our approval, and is adopted as the opinion of this court:—
“Appeal by defendant Samuel B. Adams from a money judgment rendered against him alone in favor of the plaintiff.
“The complaint alleges a contract between plaintiff and defendants, by which plaintiff was to manage and operate certain mines belonging to the defendants, for which services…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Lewis v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- McKee v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Kelley v. PloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by9 opinions
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Ellsworth v. United States Metals Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- City of Signal Hill v. WyseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Carpenter v. Elmer R. Sly Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Winsette v. WinsetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.