Gummer v. Mairs
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. P. F. Gosby, F. C. Scherrer, and D. W. Herrington, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
The complaint states two alleged causes of action; the first to foreclose a mortgage, and the second upon a contract in writing for the payment of five thousand dollars as part of the purchase price of certain land, upon certain contingencies therein stated. Defendants’ demurrer was overruled as to the first cause of action, and sustained as to the second, and plaintiff not having amended said second cause of action, judgment thereon was entered against her, and she appeals therefrom. On January 22, 1887, plaintiff’s testator, William Barrows (since deceased), was the owner in fee…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Farmers' Exchange Bank v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kaneko v. OkudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Dabney v. DabneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Douglas v. BergereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Deangeles v. CottaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Carpenter v. Elmer R. Sly Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.