Legal Opinion

PARADATA OF MINN. v. Fox

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1984No. C8-84-238PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

356 N.W.2d 852 (1984)

PARADATA OF MINNESOTA, INC., Respondent,

v.

Robert M. FOX, Appellant.

No. C8-84-238.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 30, 1984.

Review Denied February 6, 1985.

Thomas W. Wexler, Peterson, Engberg & Peterson, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Daniel J. Starks, Nichols, Kruger, Starks & Carruthers, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LESLIE and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

The trial court issued a temporary injunction restraining appellant Fox from entering respondent's office, except to obtain his personal property, and from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Cramond v. AFL-CIOSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Edin v. Jostens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. LoescherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Petition of GiblinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Saliterman v. FinneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Webb Publishing Co. v. FosshageCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. County of Blue Earth v. WingenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Bio-Line, Inc. v. BurmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Integrated Development & Manufacturing Co. v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API