Legal Opinion

Integrated Development & Manufacturing Co. v. University of Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 12, 1985No. C0-84-2114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This appeal involves the award of a competitively bid contract by respondent University of Minnesota. Two parties bid on the contract, respondent Controlled Environments, Inc., and appellant Integrated Development & Manufacturing Company. The University awarded the contract to Controlled Environments. Integrated sought a temporary injunction preventing the University and Controlled Environments from entering into or performing the contract. The trial court denied the temporary injunction. We affirm.

FACTS

In conjunction with the construction of a new building on the St.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Miller v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Cramond v. AFL-CIOSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Edin v. Jostens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Creative Communications Consultants, Inc. v. GaylordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Krueger v. Washington Federal Savings Bank of MontevideoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Griffin Companies v. First National Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API