Legal Opinion

Edin v. Jostens, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1984No. C9-83-1274PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Jostens, Inc. appeals from a Hennepin County District Court order denying its motion for a temporary injunction restraining Theodore R. Edin from violating a restrictive covenant in an employment contract. Jostens argues that the district court erred in (1) considering respondent’s claim that he was wrongfully terminated from employment in determining whether a temporary injunction should issue, (2) finding the balance of harm would be greater to respondent than to appellant if an injunction was granted and (3) finding appellant was unlikely to prevail on the merits. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  2. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. S. Todd Gibbons, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Rao v. RaoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Novus Franchising, Inc. v. Michael DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Equity Trust Co. Custodian FBO Heather Eisenmenger Ira v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Miller v. City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Saliterman v. FinneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API