Legal Opinion
Bio-Line, Inc. v. Burman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 21, 1987No. C8-86-2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellants moved to intervene in an action in which the trial court had issued a temporary restraining order directing that, unless a separate suit were initiated to claim funds at issue, the funds would be disbursed to respondent. The trial court subsequently ordered release of the funds to respondent. Appellants, proceeding pro se, argue that the trial court abused its discretion in disregarding facts they presented to it and ordering release of the funds. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent has not filed a brief. Pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 142.03, this matter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Costley v. Caromin House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Crowley Co. v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ecolab, Inc. v. GartlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In the Matter of the Civil COMMITMENT OF Kenneth Donald HANDCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Central Lakes Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 743Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987