Legal Opinion
Cramond v. AFL-CIO
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 24, 1964No. 38,893PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying a motion for a temporary injunction.
Plaintiff commenced an action for damages and equitable relief upon a claim that he was wrongfully removed from the office of president of a labor-union council. During pendency of the action, plaintiff sought a temporary injunction to restrain the holding of an election for new officers until his action was tried. Upon plaintiff’s motion, an order to show cause and temporary restraining order was issued ex parte. After a hearing, the restraining order was discharged and a temporary injunction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barnes v. MacKenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Williams v. RolfeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Northern States Power Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Behrens v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Ekeberg v. MackaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Thompson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Edin v. Jostens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Saliterman v. FinneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.