Saliterman v. Finney
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant questions a holding that a non-compete covenant in an employment agreement may not be assigned ancillary to the sale of a business, and a finding that respondent “at no time assented to any assignment [of this] agreement,” despite contractual language to the contrary. We reverse and remand.
Respondent challenges the propriety of the trial court’s order enjoining him from using confidential information obtained from appellant, his employer, when this information is not a “trade secret.” We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Dr. L.M. Saliterman and Associates, P.A., is a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Electro-Craft Corp. v. Controlled Motion, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Torrington Creamery, Inc. v. DavenportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Micro Display Systems, Inc. v. Axtel, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. KoelzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Coulter Corp. v. LeinertDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994
- FRANSMART, LLC v. Freshii Development, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Campbell v. Millennium Ventures, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.