Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Yovino-Young

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1947No. S. F. 17280PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an action for specific performance of an option to purchase agreement contained in a written lease of certain real property. The trial court found that the option was not exercised within the time of its life and accordingly rendered judgment for defendants. Prom that judgment and an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appeal.

The construction to be placed upon the several clauses of the lease definitive of the rights of the parties thereto is the sole issue in controversy. Plaintiffs contend that the “holdover” provision, allowing their month-to-month tenancy of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Prichard v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Vucinich v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wanous v. BalacoIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. CidcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Rosenaur v. PacelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API