C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. Cidco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Defendants John Michels, Raymond Magnon, Charles Sutherland and CIDCO appeal from a judgment of specific performance in favor of plaintiffs C. Robert Nattress & Associates and C. Robert Nattress as an individual. The judgment ordered defendants CIDCO and Sutherland to sell to plaintiffs a commercial building in the City of Riverside pursuant to an agreement for purchase and sale of the building that was expressly made subject to a right of first refusal held by defendant Michels, the building’s principal tenant. The judgment also required defendants Michels and Magnon, who…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gaggero v. YuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Foster v. HanniAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Pellandini v. ValadaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- BEHNIWAL v. MixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Ninety Nine Investment, Ltd. v. Overseas Courier ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.