Legal Opinion

Rosenaur v. Pacelli

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1959No. Civ. 18430PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGLER, J. pro tem. *

This is an action for specific performance of an option to purchase agreement contained in a written lease of certain real property, or in the alternative for damages for breach of contract and for declaratory relief.

The trial court found that the option had not been exercised within the time of its life, denied plaintiffs all relief, and rendered judgment in favor of the defendants on their cross-complaint quieting their title to the property in question. Plaintiffs have appealed upon a clerk’s and reporter’s transcript.

The agreement is dated April 23, 1954. It consists…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. Yovino-YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Rice Lands & Products Co. v. BlevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Wightman v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Huckaby v. NorthamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Briles v. PaulsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ripani v. Liberty Loan Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Santa Clara Properties Co. v. R. L. C., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Bekins Moving & Storage Co. v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Southern v. SouthernIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Signal Management Corp. v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API