Legal Opinion
Mott v. Cline
California Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1927No. Docket No. Sac. 3727PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
This action was brought by the assignee of a lessee who was also the holder of an option against the owner and lessor of the let premises to compel specific performance of the option provision contained in the lease providing for the purchase by said lessee of the demised premises at any time during the term of the lease. Said assignee, who relies solely upon the assignment of the option to purchase, made a tender between rent days of the purchase price as agreed upon by the owner and lessee and demanded the execution and delivery to him of a deed of the demised lands. The owner and lessor…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Fairfax's v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. SchubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Sei Fujii v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.