Cates v. McNeil
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action for unlawful detainer was brought by plaintiffs to recover possession of a tract of land in Los Angeles County under a claim that the defendants were unlawfully holding over after the expiration of their term of lease. Defendants denied such unlawful holding and by cross-complaint sought specific performance under a provision of their lease giving them an option to purchase the leased premises.
It appears that on May 26, 1902, C. B. Van Every, the predecessor in interest of the plaintiffs in the fee of the land herein involved, executed a written lease of said premises described…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hall v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Kreutzer v. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Rankin v. RankinIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Detwiler v. CaponeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Harding v. Home Investment & Savings Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.