Prichard v. Kimball
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs to have declared void a lease, to secure its cancellation of record and delivery up to them, to have the cloud upon their title to the leased premises caused by the lease removed, and to recover attorneys’ fees and costs.
Plaintiffs, on June 30, 1917, were the owners of certain described real property in Los Angeles County and on that date leased it to Wade H. Kimball and to A. J. 0. Korbel, one of the defendants herein. The lease by its terms was to expire December 31, 1920. Some time before November 18', 1918, defendant Korbel assigned his interest…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Cox v. DelmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Spaulding v. Yovino-YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.