Legal Opinion
Vucinich v. Gordon
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1942No. Civ. 13417PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question for determination on this appeal is whether the acquisition by a tenant of a one-third interest of a tenant in common terminated the lease and the obligation of such tenant under the lease.
March 25, 1935, plaintiffs who were then minors, through their guardian, and with the approval of the court, leased their undivided two-thirds interest in certain real property to defendant. They were joined in the lease by their sister, Desanka Vucinich, owner of the other one-third, whereby defendant obtained a leasehold interest on the entirety of the property which was situated in the city…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carson v. BroadyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Erving v. Jas. H. Goodman & Co. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hull v. LaugharnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Kaye v. M'DivaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Schmidt v. ConstansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Spaulding v. Yovino-YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Tri-Bullion Corp. v. American Smelting & Refining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Wendland v. KnoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Wallace v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Rossetto v. BarrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.