Legal Opinion

Bard v. Kent

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1942No. L. A. 17820PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRAYNOR, J. —

The defendant in this action, L. E. Kent, administered the "business affairs of Mrs. Ruth Roland Bard, hereinafter referred to as Miss Roland, under a general power of attorney for many years before her death. In 1933, Kent, acting as agent for Miss Roland, leased for five years a parcel of real property owned by her to Cliff Odums and Albert M. Berkson, who constructed a building on the property and installed equipment for the operation of a restaurant named the Cat and the Piddle. The restaurant failed, and Odums and Berkson abandoned the venture. Thereupon Kent, acting in his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Tiffany & Co. v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hemenway v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Marsh v. LottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. In Re the Estate of ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C. V. Holder, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
  5. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API