Demateis v. Vezu
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
On the fifteenth day of April, 1918, the plaintiff, as party of the second part, and the defendant, as party of the first part, entered into a contract in writing which provided “that for and in consideration of the amount of $500, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by the party of the first part,” the party of the first part agreed to sell to the party of the second part, and the party of the second part agreed to buy a specified quantity and quality of grapes at a stated price per ton. “Payments are to be made as follows: The amount of One Thousand Dollars is payable on commencement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- California Sugar & White Pine Agency v. PenoyarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- L.A. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Whyte v. RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Condley v. Consolidated Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Selig v. Wunderlich Contracting CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Selig v. Wunderlich Contracting CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955