L.A. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wm. A. Cheney, Herbert J. Goudge, T. E. Gibbon, and Frank J. Thomas, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. At the trial the defendant’s motion for nonsuit was granted and a judgment of dismissal entered. From this judgment plaintiff appeals.
The contract involved was in writing, and was executed by the Associated Oil Company, as party of the first part, and the Los Angeles Gas and Electric Company, the plaintiff herein, as party of the second part. The defendant Amalgamated Oil Company succeeded to all the rights and obligations of the Associated Oil Company under the contract and may, for the purposes of this discussion, be considered as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Loudenback Fertilizer Co. v. Tennessee Phosphate Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Armstrong Petroleum Corp. v. Tri-Valley Oil & Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Transportation Guarantee Co. v. JellinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- California Sugar & White Pine Agency v. PenoyarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Ogburn v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Orenstein v. KahnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.