Condley v. Consolidated Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract by defendant. Judgment went for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.
The material facts are that on May 12, 1919, plaintiff, by a written order addressed to defendant, directed it to deliver certain lumber and building material to a designated place for the purpose of constructing a bridge, and in said order agreed “to pay for said lumber and building material the sum of $1299.00 net as follows: % in 30 days from date—balance 30 Ds. thereafter,” which order was duly accepted in writing by defendant. While the. order was silent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- California Sugar & White Pine Agency v. PenoyarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- L.A. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Percival v. National Drama CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Minaker v. California Canneries Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Jensen v. GossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bridges v. FiskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- C.O. Bashaw Co. v. A. U. Pinkham Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- (PS) G.M. v. PooleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Carroll v. Belmont Park Entertainment LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- HOLA Community Partners v. SG Blocks, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.