California Sugar & White Pine Agency v. Penoyar
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County refusing a new trial. James F. Lodge, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
In this action to recover damages for the breach of a contract, there was a jury trial resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The defendants were lumbermen owning timber lands, and operating a sawmill in Siskiyou County. Plaintiff was a corporation engaged in the purchase and sale of lumber. On May 15, 1909, the parties entered into a written contract, whereby defendants agreed to sell, and plaintiff to buy, all the lumber of specified grades which defendants should manufacture at their sawmill…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Palmer v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- State v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ross v. TaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Torrey v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Kinkle v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.