Legal Opinion
Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. Wilkoski
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1978No. Civ. 17688PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.
In this unlawful detainer action, after trial to the court, judgment, including awards of attorney fees, was rendered in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. (plaintiff) is the owner and operator of a 10-story office building in Anaheim. On December 21, 1971, plaintiff leased a suite of offices known as suite 1014 on the top floor of the building to a law firm known as Maher, Moore, Rheinheimer & Jones (Maher firm) under a written 10-year lease (Maher lease).
*483In about January 1974, defendant James E. Wilkoski, who is an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Genis v. KrasneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Reid v. Valley Restaurants, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Babcock v. OmanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Standard Furniture Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1980
- Berge v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Saucedo v. Mercury Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.