Legal Opinion

Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. Wilkoski

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1978No. Civ. 17688Published

1Opinion of the Court

78 Cal.App.3d 477 (1978)

143 Cal. Rptr. 789

[*]CANAL-RANDOLPH ANAHEIM, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

JAMES B. WILKOSKI et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. 17688.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

February 10, 1978.

COUNSEL

Millar & Heckman and Richard W. Millar, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

James E. Wilkoski, in pro. per., Scott, Persinger & Muehl, James P. Persinger and Brian R. Meek for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KAUFMAN, Acting P.J.

In this unlawful detainer action, after trial to the court, judgment, including awards of attorney fees, was…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API