Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. Wilkoski
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
78 Cal.App.3d 477 (1978)
143 Cal. Rptr. 789
[*]CANAL-RANDOLPH ANAHEIM, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
JAMES B. WILKOSKI et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Docket No. 17688.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.
February 10, 1978.
COUNSEL
Millar & Heckman and Richard W. Millar, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
James E. Wilkoski, in pro. per., Scott, Persinger & Muehl, James P. Persinger and Brian R. Meek for Defendants and Respondents.
OPINION
KAUFMAN, Acting P.J.
In this unlawful detainer action, after trial to the court, judgment, including awards of attorney fees, was…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.