McFarland v. Ratcliffe
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.
Prior to September 30, 1929, the respondent sold to the appellant a combined harvester on a conditional sales contract. Default in payment having occurred, the respondents waived the forfeiture clause in the contract and brought suit for the unpaid purchase price, alleged to be $2,198.95. At the same time, they caused to be issued a writ of attachment and levied upon the combined harvester and upon other farming implements belonging to the appellant. Also; several writs of garnishment directed to various creditors were issued and served. In his answer in that case, the appellant pleaded…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seattle Crockery Co. v. HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Republic Truck Sales Corp. v. PeakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Morrissey v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Maxwell v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Market Operating Corp. v. CrullWashington Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Olsen v. National Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Taylor v. WilburWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Elsman v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1933