Legal Opinion

Olsen v. National Grocery Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1942No. 28648PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Axel Olsen and Mary W. Olsen, his wife, instituted two actions for the recovery of damages occasioned by the issuance of writs of garnishment which had caused the impounding of certain amounts due on insurance policies on their ship, which had been lost at sea. The cases were consolidated for purposes of trial and will be so considered in this appeal. The consolidated case, tried to the court sitting without a jury, resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants have appealed.

In making a statement of the essential facts, we shall closely follow the statement made in appellants’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seattle Crockery Co. v. HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Wood v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. McGill v. W. P. Fuller & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Thropp v. ErbNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Marsh v. WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reachi v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Crouter v. United Adjusters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Maib v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Petrich v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. De Wulf v. BissellArizona Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API