Taylor v. Wilbur
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— This action is based upon two bonds, one an attachment bond and the other given in the garnishment proceeding. When the case came on for trial before the court without a jury, the plaintiff’s counsel made an opening statement, which was followed by an opening statement by the counsel for the defendants which concluded with a motion
“For dismissal of the actions on counsel’s statement, and on the further ground there is a misjoinder of parties and a misjoinder of causes of action, and on the further ground that. the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Levy v. Fleischner, Mayer & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
- James v. CannellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Hogue v. McAllisterWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Wilbur v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Wild Rose Orchard Co. v. CritzerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maib v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Petrich v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Huzzy v. Culbert Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Olsen v. National Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- American Surety Company of New York v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.