Legal Opinion

Seattle Crockery Co. v. Haley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1893No. 539PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Superior Cou/rt, King Cou/nty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

Cerf, Schloss & Co., of San Francisco, brought suit in the United States circuit court against the respondent for the recovery of certain money, a large part of which was not due. In aid of their suit an attachment was issued, in pursuance of which the marshal seized the entire stock of goods of the respondent, and held them during six days, until the writ was discharged on the ground that it had been improperly issued. This was an action upon the attachment bond against the sureties only, *304the principals being non-residents, and not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spokane Truck & Dray Co. v. HoeferWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Donnell v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  3. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Pefley v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Vorse v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Sun Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Woodhouse v. PowlesWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Dorr Cattle Co. v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Tootle v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Abbott v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API