Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Griffith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1898No. 3039PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon. Leandeb H. Pbatheb, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, C. J.

The plaintiff recovered judgment in an action upon an attachment bond, from which the defendants have appealed. A motion is made to strike the appellants’ brief, because at the time the same was prepared, and also when the respondent’s brief was prepared, the appellants had not caused the clerk of the superior court to prepare or certify a transcript of the record on appeal. We think this motion should be denied, for the reason that, if the time had elapsed within which to prepare the record, the respondent should have moved against it for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Windt v. BannizaWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Seattle Crockery Co. v. HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Sheppard v. GuislerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Jensen v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Turpin v. WhitneyWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martí v. Hernández DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
  2. Tutty v. RyanWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  3. McFarland v. RatcliffeWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Spokane Dry Goods Co. v. FritzWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Martí v. Hernández DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API