Legal Opinion

Morrissey v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1924No. 12142PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This was an action by Dan Morrissey, as plaintiff, against O. A. Hurst, Leona Hurst, and various other persons, as defendants, to recover the amount due on a certain promissory note made, executed, and delivered by the defendants Hurst to the plaintiff, and for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage securing the payment of said note. Personal judgment was sought against the Hursts on the note, and also against the defendant 'W. H. Phillips, who was a subsequent purchaser of the premises, and who had assumed and agreed to pay the mortgage debt. Summons was issued for the defendants O. A.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Croker v. . WilliamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Myers v. ChamnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Rice v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wente v. ShaverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Jacobs v. Real Estate Mortg. Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Myers v. Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Continental Inv. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Importers Exporters Ins. Co. v. FarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API