Legal Opinion

Market Operating Corp. v. Crull

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1931No. 23319. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHerman, J.

— Plaintiff sought judgment against defendants for the amounts prayed for in two causes of action, and that its lien for rent be foreclosed on the personal property mentioned in the complaint. A writ of attachment was issued, and by virtue thereof prop erty subject to the lien was seized. The defendants filed a motion to discharge the attachment. .Affidavits in support of and opposing the motion were filed; and, after a hearing, an order was entered discharging the attachment, from which plaintiff appealed.

Respondents here contend that, by reason of the fact appellant asked for foreclosure of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Republic Truck Sales Corp. v. PeakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Advance Thresher Co. v. SchimkeWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Yamada v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McFarland v. RatcliffeWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API