Legal Opinion

Stapp v. Marshburn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1958No. Civ. 5758PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of an intersection automobile accident occurring on the morning of July 7, 1955, shortly before 8 o’clock. The case was tried before a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered thereon, contending that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and the trial court committed error in giving and refusing instructions.

The major portion of plaintiff’s brief is devoted to arguments respecting the weight of the evidence,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. A. F. Estabrook Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Sunshield Insulation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Pemberton v. Ince Brothers Pipeline Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Hutchison v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API