Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Elliott

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1960No. Civ. 24572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem. *

Adohr Farms Company, a partnership, and Ernest C. Elliott, defendants in the above named consolidated actions, appeal from orders made therein granting plaintiffs a new trial. The motions for new trial were granted upon the specific ground of insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdicts returned in favor of defendants.

The basic question on appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of defendants having a proximate causal connection with the injury or damage complained of by plaintiffs to warrant the granting of the new trial.

As…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Tice v. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Clippinger v. ReissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Zwerin v. Riverside Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. De Priest v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aguirre v. RenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. McCown v. Berry Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API