Legal Opinion

Pemberton v. Ince Brothers Pipeline Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1962No. Civ. 19416PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.

The plaintiffs Pemberton, husband and wife, commenced the action below to recover damages for injuries sustained when an automobile occupied by them and one Stephen San Filippo struck a mound of dirt while proceeding along Payne Avenue in the City of San Jose. They have appealed from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict, contending that the court erred in refusing and omitting certain instructions, and in admitting and refusing to admit certain evidence.

The defendant, Ince Brothers Pipeline Construction Company, a subcontractor of the defendant Santa Clara Construction Company, was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Smith v. Sugich Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Felker Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Campbell v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API