Legal Opinion

Vedder v. Bireley

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1928No. Docket No. 3506PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, a minor of the age of seven years, to recover for personal injuries received by her when she was struck by an automobile owned by defendant Bireley and operated by defendant Becker. Trial was had before a jury, and the verdict was for defendants. The appeal is from the judgment rendered upon the verdict.

The accident occurred on the south side of Third Street, in the city of Los Angeles, between Norton Avenue and Westminster. At the scene of the accident, Third Street is approximately 56 feet in width, from curb to curb, and has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Zarzana v. Neve Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Booker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Groat v. Walkup Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Brooks v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API