Legal Opinion

Guggenhime & Co. v. Lamantia

California Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 12752PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This is an action of interpleader brought by Guggenhime & Co., a corporation, to determine the rights of defendants Nelson S. Carman and the Armstrong Estate, adverse claimant, to the sum of $744.40, in the possession of plaintiff as the balance remaining unpaid on the price of dried prunes purchased by said Guggenhime & Co. from defendant John Lamantia, of whom the other defendants are creditors. The court below gave judgment in favor of defendant Nelson S. Carman for said sum of $744.40, from which judgment the Armstrong Estate prosecutes this appeal.

Defendant Nelson S. Carman is a judgment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Pullen v. Placer Country BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Goldman v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. John M. C. Marble Co. v. Merchants' National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Burkett v. DotyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. California Intelligence Bureau v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API